[time 236] Re: [time 235] Re: [time 234] Multiboundaries = Orders?


ben goertzel (ben@goertzel.org)
Fri, 16 Apr 1999 11:07:59 -0300


"Stephen P. King" wrote:

> Dear Ben,
>
> Is there any analogy between the "inside - outside" properties alluded
> to below and David Bohm's "implicate - explicate Orders"?
> ]

Hmmm... i will think about it...

>
> Later,
>
> Stephen
>
> ben goertzel wrote:
> >
> > Well hitoshi,
> >
> > well my notion of boundary is hard for me to understand too, but i will try to
> > elaborate it in a physics context when i get back from brazil (which is very
> > nice!)
> >
> > you are right that the emergence of something from nothing is an archetype
> > that is seen in the big bang and in my mathematical boundary explorations.
> > I think this is not a coincidence!
> >
> > ben
> >
> snip
> [BG]
> >But this seems to capture Hitoshi's theory too, in a slightly different way.
> >He is saying that different algebraic rules apply inside the boundary of the LS, than outside.
> >I.e. he is introducing a boundarizing operator that defines an LS. Inside the LS, calculations are done with >amplitudes; outside they are done with probabilities.
>
> snip



This archive was generated by hypermail 2.0b3 on Sun Oct 17 1999 - 22:31:52 JST