ben goertzel (email@example.com)
Fri, 16 Apr 1999 11:07:59 -0300
"Stephen P. King" wrote:
> Dear Ben,
> Is there any analogy between the "inside - outside" properties alluded
> to below and David Bohm's "implicate - explicate Orders"?
Hmmm... i will think about it...
> ben goertzel wrote:
> > Well hitoshi,
> > well my notion of boundary is hard for me to understand too, but i will try to
> > elaborate it in a physics context when i get back from brazil (which is very
> > nice!)
> > you are right that the emergence of something from nothing is an archetype
> > that is seen in the big bang and in my mathematical boundary explorations.
> > I think this is not a coincidence!
> > ben
> >But this seems to capture Hitoshi's theory too, in a slightly different way.
> >He is saying that different algebraic rules apply inside the boundary of the LS, than outside.
> >I.e. he is introducing a boundarizing operator that defines an LS. Inside the LS, calculations are done with >amplitudes; outside they are done with probabilities.
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.0b3 on Sun Oct 17 1999 - 22:31:52 JST