**Lester Zick** (*lesterzick@earthlink.net*)

*Sat, 15 May 1999 11:49:08 -0400*

**Messages sorted by:**[ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]**Next message:**Stephen P. King: "[time 316] Re: Other Minds"**Previous message:**Stephen Paul King: "[time 314] Re: Physics from Fisher Information"

The mechanical basis for particle structure can be found in the

analytical comprehension of three famous relationships applicable to

every elementary particle: Einstein's energy-mass equivalence, Planck's

constant, and the Heisenberg uncertainty constant.

Given the appropriate significance and interpretation of Planck's

constant in terms of changing angular momentum as opposed simply to

angular momentum, it becomes possible to hypothesize particle structure

in the following terms.

Particles in general represent rotating waves in space whose radius is

inversely proportional to mass. In other words, the more massive a

particle, the smaller its radius of rotation, and the smaller the radius

of rotation the greater the change in angular momentum per unit of time,

which is what causes mass through its equivalence with energy.

The radius of rotation is ultimately determined by the point at which

the velocity of rotation is equal to the velocity in space, falling

progressively toward the center of rotation. This is why particles are

particulated to begin with. They are not simply hypothetical monads

shooting through space with various properties pasted on them, such as

mass, spin, angular momentum, etc. as modern quantum theory supposes.

They are particles because they particulate a region of space over which

they rotate from approximately zero at the center of rotation to v=c at

the boundary of the particle.

Beyond this boundary, the same waveform persists in space but falls

progressively behind the boundary itself in angular terms because the

velocity of light is a finite maximum. As a result we can define the

size, mass, energy, and uncertainty of particles as well as the origin

of Planck's constant conceptually in strictly mechanical terms.

ref http://home.earthlink.net/~lesterzick under the section Analytical

Mechanics

Regards - Lester

**Next message:**Stephen P. King: "[time 316] Re: Other Minds"**Previous message:**Stephen Paul King: "[time 314] Re: Physics from Fisher Information"

*
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.0b3
on Sun Oct 17 1999 - 22:10:31 JST
*