*WDEshleman@aol.com*

*Sat, 17 Jul 1999 03:55:25 EDT*

**Messages sorted by:**[ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]**Next message:**Stephen P. King: "[time 452] Re: [time 451] Some New Mathematics"**Previous message:**Matti Pitkanen: "[time 450] Re: Schommers' work"**In reply to:**Stephen P. King: "[time 448] Re: Schommers' work"**Next in thread:**Stephen P. King: "[time 452] Re: [time 451] Some New Mathematics"

In a message dated 7/16/99 11:23:20 AM Eastern Daylight Time,

stephenk1@home.com writes:

*> How your infinite products relate to Ben's division algebras is an open
*

*> question. I am just wondering. :-)
*

Stephen,

Now you've got me wondering too... where are Ben's papers on division

algebras located? My own thoughts are that the Lorentz factor is an infinite

product of factors, whereas The Calculus prefers infinite sums. I have grown

weary of The Calculus as I feel that it is the main reason why we have failed

at unifying GR and QM. I also feel that quantum jumps seem to exist only

because it is the way that the universe deals with missing entropy packets.

IE, missing entropy seems to us to be an increase of (Shannon) information.

Bill Eshleman

**Next message:**Stephen P. King: "[time 452] Re: [time 451] Some New Mathematics"**Previous message:**Matti Pitkanen: "[time 450] Re: Schommers' work"**In reply to:**Stephen P. King: "[time 448] Re: Schommers' work"**Next in thread:**Stephen P. King: "[time 452] Re: [time 451] Some New Mathematics"

*
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.0b3
on Sun Oct 17 1999 - 22:36:56 JST
*