*WDEshleman@aol.com*

*Mon, 23 Aug 1999 04:09:07 EDT*

**Messages sorted by:**[ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]**Next message:**Matti Pitkanen: "[time 597] Re: Worlds, Dimensions, and TGD"**Previous message:**Matti Pitkanen: "[time 595] Clocks etc,"**Next in thread:**Matti Pitkanen: "[time 597] Re: Worlds, Dimensions, and TGD"

Matti,

You have proposed a 4-dimensional surface in an

8-dimensional space...what made you arrive there

instead of, say, a 4-dimensional surface on (in) a

5-dimensional space, (or 6 or 7)? The way you did

this, by doubling, is appropriate to a conversion to

a statement of worlds instead of dimensions, without

altering what you have already done. That is,

rewording we might say, 4-worlds confining

(or confined by) 8-worlds. Now, if we define a world

as a classical volume, the infinite structure of

reality (the total model for TGD) might be proposed

as 1-world confining 2-worlds confining 4-worlds

confining 8-worlds confining 16-worlds, etc.

Or as you would say it: a 1-dimensional surface in

a 2-dimensional space in a 4-dimensional space in

an 8-dimensional space in a 16-dimensional space, etc.

In relation to my own work, you have done what I could

not do; you solved the geometry and discovered rules for

the problem of 4-worlds confined by 8-worlds, but at the

same time you have left my speculation undone. That is,

that the worlds increase as 2^N in abundance at levels N =

0 to infinity. Finishing up with 1-2, 2-4 and to infinity

by induction would be very interesting to me. And who

knows, maybe some of those "embarrassing" predictions

may disappear on the completion of the geometry.

Sincerely,

Bill

**Next message:**Matti Pitkanen: "[time 597] Re: Worlds, Dimensions, and TGD"**Previous message:**Matti Pitkanen: "[time 595] Clocks etc,"**Next in thread:**Matti Pitkanen: "[time 597] Re: Worlds, Dimensions, and TGD"

*
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.0b3
on Sat Oct 16 1999 - 00:36:30 JST
*