Matti Pitkanen (firstname.lastname@example.org)
Wed, 25 Aug 1999 15:26:59 +0300 (EET DST)
On Wed, 25 Aug 1999 WDEshleman@aol.com wrote:
> In a message dated 8/25/99 6:23:08 AM Eastern Daylight Time,
> email@example.com writes:
> > I am not quite sure: perhaps we have different basic interpretation
> > but I do not quite get you idea.
> No doubt this is true, but it is I who need to catch up.
> I would just feel better if the initial objective object
> possessed infinite fine and super structure instead
> of being proposed as a finite-dimension surface in a
> finite-dimension space that reveals more hidden
> structure only after being further analyzed.
Of course very many 3-surfaces X^3 are possible. General Coordinate
forces to associate to given X^3 spacetime surface X^4(X^3), the
classical history, for Diff^4 to act on. Configuration space geometry does
3-surface is thus dynamical object. Quantum states=quantum histories
are superpositions of these 3-surfaces X^3<--> four-surfaces X^4(X^3)
and in each quantum jump this superposition changes.
The idea about single spacetime is realized only approximately, for
istance in cosmology: actually also cosmology (represented
by Lorentz invariant spacetime surface)
in principle changes quantum jump by quantum.
I hope that this helps to understand my view.
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.0b3 on Sat Oct 16 1999 - 00:36:30 JST