*WDEshleman@aol.com*

*Fri, 3 Sep 1999 23:25:48 EDT*

**Messages sorted by:**[ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]**Next message:**Matti Pitkanen: "[time 669] Re: [time 660] Re: [time 659] Cylindrical But Locally Lorentzian Universes"**Previous message:**WDEshleman@aol.com: "[time 667] Stephens duality theory, Plus"**Next in thread:**Matti Pitkanen: "[time 670] Re: [time 664] Reply to NOW/PAST question"

*> > [MP]
*

*> > a) I could not quite understand you NOW= PAST + x*PAST. If one starts
*

*> > from Schrodinger equation one has -i dPsi/dt= HPsi.
*

*> > Psi(t+deltat) = Psi(t) + i*HPsi(t)*Deltat = (1+ iH*delta t )*Psi(t)
*

*>
*

*> [MP] Sorry for lacking "=" in the formula above.
*

*>
*

[WDE]

No problem, I just copied and pasted independent of the physics. Lets

see if I can fix it up.

x = iH*(delta t)

=> NOW/PAST = Psi(t+deltat)/Psi(t)

= { 1+ iH*(delta t ) }

but, from seeing how relativity works, I suggest,

NOW/PAST = Psi(t+deltat)/Psi(t) = 1/(1 - x)

= { 1/(1 - iH*(delta t) }

not very much of a difference if,

iH*(delta t) is small relative to 1,

but as iH*(delta t) approaches 1,

NOW/PAST = Psi(t+deltat)/Psi(t) approaches infinity,

and I suggest that this is one of the requirements

for unification of Relativity and QM.

That is, if x = v^2/c^2,

then, { ( M ) }^2 = { (M_0)^2 } / (1 - x),

and, { ( T ) }^2 = { (T_0)^2 } / (1 - x),

and, { ( L ) }^2 = { (L_0)^2 } * (1 - x).

suggest the necessity to do the same for QM. Please

recomment on the fixed equations.

Matti, you may

think it is contrary to common sense when I propose that

NOW is NOT "pushed" from the PAST by a PAST operator,

but that the PAST was attracted to all possible NOW's by

an operator that only becomes evaluated in the NOW.

Another way of saying this is that NOW is attracted to

all FUTUREs by an operator to be measured in the FUTURE.

My disclaimer is that this state of affairs is due a subjective

limitation of the observer and by "psychophysical parallelism",

all objects are observers. And, that the underlying objective

structure has been programmed to subjectively mimic an

attraction to the FUTURE by objectively requiring every

augmentation of state in a given world to be accompanied by

related augmentations in a majority of other worlds. That is,

( 1 + x ) objectively in multiplicity leads to a subjective

reality where the FUTURE seems to attract the PRESENT.

My infinite products are simply candidates for role of the

objective multiplicity that subjectively offers the seemingly

non-intuitive conclusions drawn above.

Sincerely,

Bill

**Next message:**Matti Pitkanen: "[time 669] Re: [time 660] Re: [time 659] Cylindrical But Locally Lorentzian Universes"**Previous message:**WDEshleman@aol.com: "[time 667] Stephens duality theory, Plus"**Next in thread:**Matti Pitkanen: "[time 670] Re: [time 664] Reply to NOW/PAST question"

*
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.0b3
on Sat Oct 16 1999 - 00:36:39 JST
*