Stephen P. King (firstname.lastname@example.org)
Mon, 06 Sep 1999 04:34:19 -0400
It would be canonically conjugate to the LS's Hamiltonian... It's
Hitoshi Kitada wrote:
> Dear Stephen,
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: Stephen P. King <email@example.com>
> To: Time List <firstname.lastname@example.org>
> Sent: Monday, September 06, 1999 5:08 PM
> Subject: [time 686] Time operator?
> > Dear Hitoshi,
> > Can we define a time operator in LS theory?
> I am not sure on what elements the time operator act.
> > Later,
> > Stephen
> Best wishes,
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.0b3 on Sat Oct 16 1999 - 00:36:39 JST