**Hitoshi Kitada** (*hitoshi@kitada.com*)

*Tue, 7 Sep 1999 18:37:57 +0900*

**Messages sorted by:**[ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]**Next message:**WDEshleman@aol.com: "[time 705] FTL propagations"**Previous message:**WDEshleman@aol.com: "[time 703] Re: [time 694] Re: [time 674] Reply to NOW/PAST question"**Maybe in reply to:**WDEshleman@aol.com: "[time 694] Re: [time 674] Reply to NOW/PAST question"

Dear Bill,

Bill <WDEshleman@aol.com> wrote:

Subject: [time 703] Re: [time 694] Re: [time 674] Reply to NOW/PAST question

*> In a message dated 9/6/99 12:30:09 PM Eastern Daylight Time,
*

*> hitoshi@kitada.com writes:
*

[snip]

*> I've now read your paper on local times. Usually when I read
*

*> I find my intuitions evaporate and my notions crushed, but
*

*> when I read your work I find that you agree that relativity alters
*

*> the subjective experience of the observer, but to say that the
*

*> Schrodinger perspective is the objective perspective for local
*

*> systems? I will accept that. It is interesting to note that a
*

*> "factorial operator" will transform
*

*>
*

*> 1/(1-x) = (1+x+x^2+x^3+ ...) to
*

*> exp(x) = (1+x+x^2/2!+x^3/3!+...).
*

*>
*

*> As you say in your paper, "The quantum phenomena occurring is a local
*

*> system follow non-relativistic quantum mechanics, but the observed
*

*> values of quantum mechanical quantities should be corrected according
*

*> to the classical relativity so that the corrected values equal the values
*

*> predicted by the (non-relativistic) quantum mechanics."
*

*>
*

*> Would not the "factorial operator" qualify as a corrector?
*

Yes, if you mean by the factorial operator the one that tansforms n to n!,

your statement is right and justifies the transformation from QM to Relativity

and vice versa, on the level of calculus/mathematical rules. I postulated this

relation between QM and relativity as a mathematical framewrok and proved its

consistency as a mathematical theorem. We have justifications on the same

level: I think you can assure the consistency of the two views related by the

transformation by the factorial operator with some additional words.

As a corrector, the factorial operator transformation might be useful in

applications and would make the understanding of the consistent unification of

the two seemingly contradictory views easier.

*>
*

*> Sincerely,
*

*>
*

*> Bill
*

*>
*

Best wishes,

Hitoshi

**Next message:**WDEshleman@aol.com: "[time 705] FTL propagations"**Previous message:**WDEshleman@aol.com: "[time 703] Re: [time 694] Re: [time 674] Reply to NOW/PAST question"**Maybe in reply to:**WDEshleman@aol.com: "[time 694] Re: [time 674] Reply to NOW/PAST question"

*
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.0b3
on Sat Oct 16 1999 - 00:36:39 JST
*