[time 788] Re: [time 782] Re: [time 778] Noumenon and Phenomenon

Stephen P. King (stephenk1@home.com)
Sun, 19 Sep 1999 00:52:10 -0400

Dear Bill,

        You are getting very close to what Pratt is saying!

WDEshleman@aol.com wrote:
> [WDE]
> > > By instantaneous I mean, in your case, that a GR deflection is immediately
> > > followed by an appropriate QM deflection propagated faster than light
> > > (or infinite) speed, and vice versa for a QM deflection.
> >
> [HK]
> > This would be rephrased as a consistency requirement for the inside and the
> > outside. If any delay existed, consistency would be lost. In this sense,
> > this
> > FTL requirement seems to be the same as Leibniz' "pre-established harmony"
> > that would explain the windowless monads behave in harmony with the
> outside.
> >
> [WDE]
> I am now wondering whether I need another feature for the noumenon...
> i.e., a function describing the relationship between the independent axes.
> Everett would essentially put in the identity function y=x so that
> a majority of other worlds would be nearly identical to our world. My call
> for instantaneousness would then mean that y=f(x) and x=finverse(y) would
> happen immediately or the equivalence would not be. Yes, I think that
> a function of (x,y) pairs should be part of the noumenon; especially since
> all of you probably thought it was? Is this a breakthru or breakdown?

        Should we not consider that each observer has its own noumenon, its own
mind, that is independent of all others?



This archive was generated by hypermail 2.0b3 on Sat Oct 16 1999 - 00:36:41 JST