Stephen P. King (firstname.lastname@example.org)
Tue, 21 Sep 1999 10:40:24 -0400
Lancelot Fletcher wrote:
> Now, to finish with Pratt, let me say this to Stephen:
> I have concluded that Pratt's paper is too incompetently written to be
> worth discussing directly. I understand that you believe it contains some
> brilliant and possibly important and original insights. That may be true.
> It's also possible that you have had some important and original insights
> of your own while you were reading Pratt's paper which were not actually
> Pratt's insights but yours. It doesn't really matter whose insights they
> are. If you can express them more clearly and rigorously than Pratt has
> done, I will be very happy to listen to you.
Ok, I will differ to your judgment. I am very tired lately and and my
communications are incoherent. I will have to do something... I have an
idea or insight about that I think Pratt is trying to say. I will try
hard to break it down into "easy pieces" and see if it makes any sense
to you all.
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.0b3 on Sat Oct 16 1999 - 00:36:41 JST