Hitoshi Kitada (firstname.lastname@example.org)
Mon, 27 Sep 1999 14:25:10 +0900
----- Original Message -----
From: Matti Pitkanen <email@example.com>
To: Hitoshi Kitada <firstname.lastname@example.org>
Cc: Time List <email@example.com>
Sent: Monday, September 27, 1999 1:44 PM
Subject: [time 820] Re: [time 819] Re: [time 817] Re: [time 816] Re: [time
815] Asummary on [time814] Still about construction ofU
> On Mon, 27 Sep 1999, Hitoshi Kitada wrote:
> > You seem to misunderstand my notation. I gave you sufficient help. You
> > think with your "p-adic" world by yourself.
> Sorry. It seems that it is you who misunderstands something.
If you think so and understand my notation and mathematics, you should write
the point in my context. This is the least politeness in communicating with
others. I myself did so in understanding your "physics."
> This is not
> about notations. It is about physics and mathematical content. I
> understand you notation quite well. I understand also your point,
> it is correct and I am
> grateful that you made it. In real context
> scattering solution leads to trivial S-matrix if one assumes
> On the other hand, Hilb_0 subspace of Hilb leads to problems
> with unitarity.
Here is your misunderstanding.
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.0b3 on Sat Oct 16 1999 - 00:36:42 JST