**Hitoshi Kitada** (*hitoshi@kitada.com*)

*Fri, 8 Oct 1999 23:48:25 +0900*

**Messages sorted by:**[ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]**Next message:**Ben Goertzel: "[time 913] RE: [time 912] Re: [time 911] RE: [time 910] Re: [time 909] About your proof of unitarity"**Previous message:**Ben Goertzel: "[time 911] RE: [time 910] Re: [time 909] About your proof of unitarity"**In reply to:**Hitoshi Kitada: "[time 910] Re: [time 909] About your proof of unitarity"**Next in thread:**Ben Goertzel: "[time 913] RE: [time 912] Re: [time 911] RE: [time 910] Re: [time 909] About your proof of unitarity"

Dear Ben,

Ben Goertzel <ben@goertzel.org> wrote:

Subject: [time 911] RE: [time 910] Re: [time 909] About your proof of

unitarity

*>
*

*> >
*

*> > Physicists look like to talk much. Mathematicians just talk about
*

*> > what they
*

*> > knows without making redundant comments.
*

*> >
*

*> > Best wishes,
*

*> > Hitoshi
*

*>
*

*>
*

*> I must observe that the use of undefined integrals has a rather esteemed
*

*> history in physics....
*

*>
*

*> The Feynman integral was basically undefined mathematically when Feynman
*

*> started using it, then many
*

*> years later, mathematicians figured out ways to define it mathematically in
*

*> many useful cases.
*

In a few cases... I had been studying Feynman integral myself. It is hard to

say that it has been given a definition mathematically.

*>
*

*> This is just a general comment, I haven't been following the mathematical
*

*> arguments of Matti & Hitoshi
*

*> in much detail
*

*>
*

*> Ben
*

*>
*

Best wishes,

Hitoshi

**Next message:**Ben Goertzel: "[time 913] RE: [time 912] Re: [time 911] RE: [time 910] Re: [time 909] About your proof of unitarity"**Previous message:**Ben Goertzel: "[time 911] RE: [time 910] Re: [time 909] About your proof of unitarity"**In reply to:**Hitoshi Kitada: "[time 910] Re: [time 909] About your proof of unitarity"**Next in thread:**Ben Goertzel: "[time 913] RE: [time 912] Re: [time 911] RE: [time 910] Re: [time 909] About your proof of unitarity"

*
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.0b3
on Sun Oct 17 1999 - 22:40:47 JST
*