Hitoshi Kitada (email@example.com)
Fri, 8 Oct 1999 23:48:25 +0900
Ben Goertzel <firstname.lastname@example.org> wrote:
Subject: [time 911] RE: [time 910] Re: [time 909] About your proof of
> > Physicists look like to talk much. Mathematicians just talk about
> > what they
> > knows without making redundant comments.
> > Best wishes,
> > Hitoshi
> I must observe that the use of undefined integrals has a rather esteemed
> history in physics....
> The Feynman integral was basically undefined mathematically when Feynman
> started using it, then many
> years later, mathematicians figured out ways to define it mathematically in
> many useful cases.
In a few cases... I had been studying Feynman integral myself. It is hard to
say that it has been given a definition mathematically.
> This is just a general comment, I haven't been following the mathematical
> arguments of Matti & Hitoshi
> in much detail
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.0b3 on Sun Oct 17 1999 - 22:40:47 JST