**Stephen P. King** (*stephenk1@home.com*)

*Fri, 29 Oct 1999 00:52:29 -0400*

**Messages sorted by:**[ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]**Next message:**Hitoshi Kitada: "[time 963] Re: [time 962] Re: [time 961] Re: [time 959] [Fwd: This Week's Finds in Mathematical Physics (Week 141)]"**Previous message:**Hitoshi Kitada: "[time 961] Re: [time 959] [Fwd: This Week's Finds in Mathematical Physics (Week 141)]"**In reply to:**Stephen P. King: "[time 959] [Fwd: This Week's Finds in Mathematical Physics (Week 141)]"**Next in thread:**Hitoshi Kitada: "[time 963] Re: [time 962] Re: [time 961] Re: [time 959] [Fwd: This Week's Finds in Mathematical Physics (Week 141)]"

Dear Hitoshi and Friends,

Hitoshi Kitada wrote:

*>
*

*> Is John Baez a journalist?
*

No, I would not say that Baez is a journalist, he is a "mathematical

physicist who specializes in quantum gravity and n-category theory"

http://math.ucr.edu/home/baez/

He writes a column called "This Week's Finds in Mathematical Physics"

that outlines his adventures, it is like a public diary...

http://math.ucr.edu/home/baez/TWF.html

*> Paraconsistency is a modification of consistency so that paradoxes like the
*

*> one by Russell's are admitted but still theories have meanings, i.e. such
*

*> theories should be nontrivial.
*

*>
*

*> I agree with that this is a nice modification, and may be worth being
*

*> researched.
*

definition: http://plato.stanford.edu/entries/logic-paraconsistent/

I found this. It looks interesting!

http://www.hpl.hp.com/techreports/97/HPL-97-129.html

Here is a philosopher's page on the subject:

http://members.tripod.com/Lonego/

In Japanese

http://www.swlab.csce.kyushu-u.ac.jp/~goshi/semi/a94spicis/sld024.htm

A big list of different kinds of logics!

http://www.intrepidsoftware.com/fallacy/branches.htm

[I am reminded of what happened when the parallel postulate was

questioned! %^} ]

*> But where is Baez's contribution in the news group more than a role of a
*

*> moderator of the group?
*

Oh, boy, Baez is *very* active in the discussions going on in the

sci.physics.research news group. I find that he has some very good ideas

[n-category theory] and would very much like to get him to take an

objective (unprejudiced) look at Local Systems theory to see his

response, since he is very much aware of the Problem of Time!

Unfortunately, the theory's implication that the Big Bang is an

(optical?) illusion is very hard for most to swallow! :-(

*> Best wishes,
*

*> Hitoshi
*

*>
*

*> ----- Original Message -----
*

*> From: Stephen P. King <stephenk1@home.com>
*

*> To: Time List <time@kitada.com>
*

*> Sent: Thursday, October 28, 1999 3:54 AM
*

*> Subject: [time 959] [Fwd: This Week's Finds in Mathematical Physics (Week
*

*> 141)]
*

Kindest regards,

Stephen

**Next message:**Hitoshi Kitada: "[time 963] Re: [time 962] Re: [time 961] Re: [time 959] [Fwd: This Week's Finds in Mathematical Physics (Week 141)]"**Previous message:**Hitoshi Kitada: "[time 961] Re: [time 959] [Fwd: This Week's Finds in Mathematical Physics (Week 141)]"**In reply to:**Stephen P. King: "[time 959] [Fwd: This Week's Finds in Mathematical Physics (Week 141)]"**Next in thread:**Hitoshi Kitada: "[time 963] Re: [time 962] Re: [time 961] Re: [time 959] [Fwd: This Week's Finds in Mathematical Physics (Week 141)]"

*
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.0b3
on Mon Nov 01 1999 - 01:24:39 JST
*