Sat, 20 Mar 1999 05:10:36 -0800
Hitoshi Kitada wrote:
> > Date: Fri, 26 Mar 1999 12:48:07 -0500 (EST)
> > From: Doug Sweetser <email@example.com>
> > To: Hitoshi Kitada <firstname.lastname@example.org>
> > Cc: "Stephen P. King" <email@example.com>, Time List <firstname.lastname@example.org>
> > Subject: RE: [time 58] Re: your "Is there a better way than
> renormalization?" po
> > Hello Hitoshi:
> > You have provided an extensive summary of the history with the consensus
> > explanations of "what all this means". I still wonder about this
> > conclusions:
> > > > These are the situation currently understood as an incompatibility
> > > > problem between quantum theory and special theory of relativity.
> > The way I use "incompatiblility" it implies conflict. Quantum theory
> > completely respects the axioms of special relativity, therefore it is not
> > incompatible. Calculations in quantum theory work, but in a "clucky" way
> > ("clucky" being a made-up word indicating it works, but not elegantly).
> > The observation that it is difficult to find a word to describe the
> > conflict probably is a reflection of the subltety of the issue.
> > There is also a good number of folks that think that the mathematical
> > difficulties indicate problems with exactly how time is handled. Should
> > we include you in that group? Since this is an issue where nuance is
> > important, I will not include myself. Instead, I think that defining time
> > does not make sense, but spacetime does. To quote from a piece of art I
> > made, "Il n'y a pas d'espace sans temps, pas de temps sans espace" in
> > English means "There is no space without time, no time without space".
> > Good luck with your work,
> > doug
I do not see conflict between "space" and "time" but that they
are complementary in the sense that we distinguish space at
the expense of distinguishing time and vice versa. This dualism
makes "space-time" seem quite natural just as the wave and particle
duality was resolved by calling these "wave-particles".
Somehow I think that your Local Systems should form structure
from an "economy" as a constraint:
I've been talking in the talk.philosophy.buddism with some interesting people:
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.0b3 on Sat Oct 16 1999 - 00:29:46 JST