**Stephen P. King** (*stephenk1@home.com*)

*Sun, 04 Apr 1999 12:38:49 -0400*

**Messages sorted by:**[ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]**Next message:**Ben Goertzel: "[time 144] Re: [time 121] RE: [time 115] On Pratt's Duality [time 81] Entropy, wholeness, dialogue, algebras"**Previous message:**Ben Goertzel: "[time 142] Re: [time 136] Re: [time 123] RE: [time 69] Spacetime & consciousness"**In reply to:**Matti Pitkanen: "[time 136] Re: [time 123] RE: [time 69] Spacetime & consciousness"**Next in thread:**Matti Pitkanen: "[time 90] Re: [time 77] Spacetime &consciousness"

Hi guys,

Are they not set-wise complements of each other? Like an independent

graph and a complete graph?

??

Stephen

Ben Goertzel wrote:

*>
*

*> >p-Adic numbers with norm bounded by some upper bound
*

*> >are of from x= p^rk , where k is possibly *infinite* integer
*

*> >having pinary expansion k= SUM(n>=0) k_np^n. These numbers form a
*

*> >discrete set! The real counterparts of these numbers in canonical
*

*> >identification SUM x_np^n --> SUM x_np^(-n) however form a continuum!
*

*>
*

*> I don't understand this. It sounds like you are saying that a discrete set
*

*> (cardinality aleph null) is isomorphic to a continuum (cardinality aleph one),
*

*> which is impossible, and so obviously is not what you're really saying!!!
*

*>
*

*> ??
*

*>
*

*> ben
*

**Next message:**Ben Goertzel: "[time 144] Re: [time 121] RE: [time 115] On Pratt's Duality [time 81] Entropy, wholeness, dialogue, algebras"**Previous message:**Ben Goertzel: "[time 142] Re: [time 136] Re: [time 123] RE: [time 69] Spacetime & consciousness"**In reply to:**Matti Pitkanen: "[time 136] Re: [time 123] RE: [time 69] Spacetime & consciousness"**Next in thread:**Matti Pitkanen: "[time 90] Re: [time 77] Spacetime &consciousness"

*
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.0b3
on Sun Oct 17 1999 - 22:31:51 JST
*