Hitoshi Kitada (email@example.com)
Sun, 31 Oct 1999 19:06:16 +0900
Thanks for your explanation.
Stephen P. King <firstname.lastname@example.org> wrote:
Subject: [time 962] Re: [time 961] Re: [time 959] [Fwd: This Week's Finds in
Mathematical Physics (Week 141)]
> Dear Hitoshi and Friends,
> Hitoshi Kitada wrote:
> > Is John Baez a journalist?
> No, I would not say that Baez is a journalist, he is a "mathematical
> physicist who specializes in quantum gravity and n-category theory"
> He writes a column called "This Week's Finds in Mathematical Physics"
> that outlines his adventures, it is like a public diary...
> > Paraconsistency is a modification of consistency so that paradoxes like
> > one by Russell's are admitted but still theories have meanings, i.e. such
> > theories should be nontrivial.
> > I agree with that this is a nice modification, and may be worth being
> > researched.
> definition: http://plato.stanford.edu/entries/logic-paraconsistent/
> I found this. It looks interesting!
> Here is a philosopher's page on the subject:
> In Japanese
> A big list of different kinds of logics!
> [I am reminded of what happened when the parallel postulate was
> questioned! %^} ]
> > But where is Baez's contribution in the news group more than a role of a
> > moderator of the group?
> Oh, boy, Baez is *very* active in the discussions going on in the
> sci.physics.research news group. I find that he has some very good ideas
> [n-category theory] and would very much like to get him to take an
> objective (unprejudiced) look at Local Systems theory to see his
> response, since he is very much aware of the Problem of Time!
I am trying him, sending some of my papers to him.
> Unfortunately, the theory's implication that the Big Bang is an
> (optical?) illusion is very hard for most to swallow! :-(
Is the explanation given in time_II.tex and time_IV.tex not sufficient
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.0b3 on Mon Nov 01 1999 - 01:24:39 JST