[time 690] Re: [time 689] Re: [time 688] Re: [time 687] Re: [time 686] Time operator?

Stephen P. King (stephenk1@home.com)
Mon, 06 Sep 1999 04:54:43 -0400

I am thinking hard about this! Have you read the latest books by


Hitoshi Kitada wrote:
> Dear Stephen,
> > Hi Hitoshi,
> >
> > It would be canonically conjugate to the LS's Hamiltonian... It's
> > energy?
> Let H be the Hamiltonian of the LS: L, consisting of N particles 1,2, ... ,N.
> H acts on the state vector (function) Psi(t) of the system, where t is the
> local time of L. In this case what do you mean by canonical conjugate to H? If
> such a conjugate exists, on what space is it defined (or on which things does
> the canonical conjugate, say T, act), and how does T act on such things? H in
> itself means the energy in QM.
> Best wishes,
> Hitoshi

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.0b3 on Sat Oct 16 1999 - 00:36:39 JST